IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Laite Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-09-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 37 4 19 23 0.622 0.1197 0.1192 0.3920 0.3903
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 University of New England D3 CNE SR 25 10 15 25 1.000
2011-12 University of New England D3 CNE JR 25 5 10 15 0.600
2010-11 University of New England D3 CNE SO 21 5 9 14 0.667
2009-10 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC FR 14 5 1 6 0.429
2009-10 University of New England D3 CNE FR 11 4 5 9 0.818
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2009-10 · SUNY Morrisville
+320.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33558
Forward overall
#1117
Forward born in 1988
#585
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Nelson
Johnson & Wales · 2021-22
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Zac Sikich
SUNY Brockport · 2012-13
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Schneider
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
0.393 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.