IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Victor Malzahn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-10-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Andover NE-Prep 20 1 8 9 0.450 0.0891 0.0891 0.2050 0.2050
2019-20 Andover NE-Prep 28 2 7 9 0.321 0.0637 0.0637 0.1464 0.1464
2021-22 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 43 4 19 23 0.535 0.1236 0.1280 0.2617 0.2711
2022-23 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 43 4 17 21 0.488 0.1128 0.1110 0.2390 0.2351
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC JR 23 2 2 4 0.174
2023-24 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC FR 6 0 3 3 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2023-24 · SUNY Brockport
+349.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10034
Defenseman overall
#2144
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stevie Bryant
UMass Boston · 2017-18
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Ondrejko
Western New England · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Bourgonje
Wentworth · 2009-10
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.