IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Bourgonje Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-09-22 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Univ. of Alberta · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Southeast Blades MJHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.0642 0.0705 0.2102 0.2310
2007-08 Nipawin Hawks SJHL 58 5 8 13 0.224 0.0574 0.0604 0.1689 0.1778
2008-09 St. Louis Bandits NAHL 52 9 10 19 0.365 0.1342 0.1337 0.3857 0.3843
2009-10 St. Louis Bandits NAHL 51 18 18 36 0.706 0.2593 0.2479 0.7451 0.7124
2010-11 Univ. of Alberta USports-M 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Wentworth D3 CNE — 9 2 5 7 0.778
2013-14 Wentworth D3 CNE — 21 6 8 14 0.667
2012-13 Wentworth D3 CNE — 18 2 4 6 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2012-13 · Wentworth
+92.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29720
Forward overall
#984
Forward born in 1989

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Toon De Schepper
Wilkes · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Teddy Purcell
SUNY Geneseo · 2005-06
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mac Olson
Hobart · 2011-12
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.