IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stevie Bryant Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-10-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 49 8 14 22 0.449 0.1650 0.1827 0.4739 0.5246
2015-16 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 51 6 8 14 0.275 0.1009 0.1072 0.2897 0.3079
2016-17 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 57 12 19 31 0.544 0.1824 0.1815 0.5033 0.5009
2017-18 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 57 10 27 37 0.649 0.2177 0.2044 0.6007 0.5640
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 UMass Boston D1 NEHC FR 25 4 5 9 0.360
2018-19 UMass Boston D3 NEHC FR 25 4 5 9 0.360
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2018-19 · UMass Boston
+115.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31603
Forward overall
#1484
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cole Skelly
New England College · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jon Groth
Wesleyan · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Joshua Delezenne
Westfield State · 2015-16
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.