IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stevie Bryant Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-10-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 49 8 14 22 0.449 0.1667 0.1845 0.4754 0.5263
2015-16 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 51 6 8 14 0.275 0.1019 0.1083 0.2906 0.3088
2016-17 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 57 12 19 31 0.544 0.1817 0.1808 0.5049 0.5025
2017-18 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 57 10 27 37 0.649 0.2168 0.2036 0.6026 0.5658
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast FR 25 4 5 9 0.360
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2018-19 · UMass Boston
+116.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
35%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22957
Forward overall
#985
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tucker Coborn
Concordia · 2011-12
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dante Zapata
Utica · 2018-19
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Carpinone
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2000-01
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.