IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Riley Riddell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-09-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 54 7 24 31 0.574 0.1624 0.1701 0.3617 0.3789
2005-06 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 57 40 35 75 1.316 0.3722 0.3707 0.8291 0.8258
2006-07 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 62 34 50 84 1.355 0.3833 0.3638 0.8537 0.8103
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 St. Scholastica D3 — SR 26 5 19 24 0.923
2009-10 St. Scholastica D3 — JR 27 8 13 21 0.778
2008-09 St. Scholastica D3 — FR 4 1 0 1 0.250
2007-08 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — FR 22 2 4 6 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2007-08 · Wisconsin-River Falls
-13.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8573
Forward overall
#339
Forward born in 1986
#95
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Anthony Pickering
Concordia Wisconsin · 2013-14
0.809 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Dicarlo
SUNY Oswego · 2018-19
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Albano
UMass Boston · 2016-17
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.