IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David MacGregor Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-12-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 — MJHL 58 6 9 15 0.259 0.0498 0.0504 0.1631 0.1650
2014-15 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights EHL 44 9 27 36 0.818 0.1890 0.1841 0.4003 0.3899
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 UMass Boston D1 NEHC SR 28 2 3 5 0.179
2018-19 UMass Boston D3 NEHC SR 28 2 3 5 0.179
2017-18 UMass Boston D3 NEHC JR 27 3 8 11 0.407
2016-17 UMass Boston D3 MASCAC SO 16 3 0 3 0.188
2015-16 UMass Boston D3 MASCAC FR 31 3 10 13 0.419
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2015-16 · UMass Boston
+275.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28869
Forward overall
#1107
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joshua Larson
Fitchburg State · 2015-16
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mason Ledbetter
Framingham State · 2017-18
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jonah Copre
Lake Forest · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.