IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David MacGregor Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-12-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 — MJHL 58 6 9 15 0.259 0.0732 0.0741 0.1629 0.1648
2014-15 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights EHL 44 9 27 36 0.818 0.1756 0.1710 0.4007 0.3903
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast SR 28 2 3 5 0.179
2017-18 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast JR 27 3 8 11 0.407
2016-17 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast SO 16 3 0 3 0.188
2015-16 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast FR 31 3 10 13 0.419
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2015-16 · UMass Boston
+270.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30836
Forward overall
#1270
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joshua Larson
Fitchburg State · 2015-16
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bart Moran
Castleton · 2012-13
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brad Pizzey
Nazareth · 2014-15
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.