IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Lynes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-11-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Philadelphia Flyers Elite USPHL-Premier-Classic 50 23 32 55 1.100 0.3303 0.3232 0.9061 0.8868
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SR 9 2 0 2 0.222
2017-18 SUNY Geneseo D3 — JR 19 2 5 7 0.368
2016-17 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SO 11 2 1 3 0.273
2015-16 SUNY Geneseo D3 — FR 17 4 1 5 0.294
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2015-16 · SUNY Geneseo
+6.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8532
Forward overall
#345
Forward born in 1994
#17
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Grant Everett
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2007-08
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Collins
Elmira · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Hall
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.