Dean Stewart Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-06-12 Country: Canada

2016 · Round 7, Pick #188 ·

Utah Mammoth (via ARI)

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2014-15	Portage Terriers	MJHL	33	1	5	6	0.182	0.0350	0.0397	0.1146	0.1301
2015-16	Portage Terriers	MJHL	42	8	14	22	0.524	0.1008	0.1092	0.3303	0.3577
2024-25	Vityaz Moscow Region	KHL	52	5	10	15	0.288	0.7212	0.7347	3.9752	4.0494

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2019-20	Nebraska Omaha	D1	NCHC	SR	34	2	10	12	0.353
2018-19	Nebraska Omaha	D1	NCHC	JR	36	5	16	21	0.583
2017-18	Nebraska Omaha	D1	NCHC	SO	31	0	5	5	0.161
2016-17	Nebraska Omaha	D1	NCHC	FR	29	0	7	7	0.241

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.08

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.24

2016-17 · Nebraska Omaha

+214.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

75%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1980

Defenseman overall

#441

Defenseman born in 1998

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm

Neumann · 2003-04

1.800 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Arkhip Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Brandon Osmundson

Utica · 2018-19

1.448 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.