← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jim Pearson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-12-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 16 1 3 4 0.250 0.0713 0.0781 0.1935 0.2120
2013-14 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 9 0 2 2 0.222 0.0634 0.0663 0.1720 0.1798
2014-15 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 61 31 40 71 1.164 0.3322 0.3320 0.9010 0.9004
2015-16 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 59 19 25 44 0.746 0.2129 0.2025 0.5773 0.5491
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 25 5 5 10 0.400
2019-20 Concordia Wisconsin D3 SR 25 5 5 10 0.400
2018-19 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 24 4 3 7 0.292
2018-19 Concordia Wisconsin D3 JR 24 4 3 7 0.292
2017-18 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 27 6 8 14 0.518
2017-18 Concordia Wisconsin D3 SO 27 6 8 14 0.518
2016-17 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 24 10 7 17 0.708
2016-17 Concordia Wisconsin D3 FR 24 10 7 17 0.708
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2016-17 · Concordia
+225.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17933
Forward overall
#682
Forward born in 1995
#508
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2018-19
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2018-19
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.