| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Carleton Place Canadians | CCHL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2012-13 | Carleton Place Canadians | CCHL | 16 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.250 | 0.0542 | 0.0594 | 0.1934 | 0.2118 |
| 2013-14 | Carleton Place Canadians | CCHL | 9 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.222 | 0.0482 | 0.0504 | 0.1719 | 0.1797 |
| 2014-15 | Ottawa Jr. Senators | CCHL | 61 | 31 | 40 | 71 | 1.164 | 0.2524 | 0.2522 | 0.9005 | 0.8999 |
| 2015-16 | Ottawa Jr. Senators | CCHL | 59 | 19 | 25 | 44 | 0.746 | 0.1618 | 0.1539 | 0.5770 | 0.5488 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Concordia | D3 | MIAC | SR | 25 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 0.400 |
| 2019-20 | Concordia (WI) | D1 | NCHA | SR | 25 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 0.400 |
| 2019-20 | Concordia (WI) | D3 | NCHA | SR | 25 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 0.400 |
| 2018-19 | Concordia | D3 | MIAC | JR | 24 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 0.292 |
| 2018-19 | Concordia (WI) | D1 | NCHA | JR | 24 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 0.292 |
| 2018-19 | Concordia (WI) | D3 | NCHA | JR | 24 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 0.292 |
| 2017-18 | Concordia | D3 | MIAC | SO | 27 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 0.518 |
| 2017-18 | Concordia (WI) | D3 | NCHA | SO | 27 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 0.518 |
| 2016-17 | Concordia | D3 | MIAC | FR | 24 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 0.708 |
| 2016-17 | Concordia (WI) | D3 | NCHA | FR | 24 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 0.708 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.