IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Jewett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-12-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EHL 39 6 12 18 0.462 0.0990 0.1013 0.2260 0.2313
2015-16 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EHL 37 18 14 32 0.865 0.1856 0.1818 0.4235 0.4148
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Stonehill D2 NE10 SR 27 4 1 5 0.185
2018-19 Stonehill D2 NE10 JR 26 3 5 8 0.308
2017-18 Stonehill D2 NE10 SO 24 4 4 8 0.333
2016-17 Stonehill D2 NE10 FR 27 5 5 10 0.370
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2016-17 · Stonehill
+189.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27679
Forward overall
#1129
Forward born in 1995
#487
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Wisely
Hamline · 2016-17
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Oddleifson
Wentworth · 2003-04
0.619 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Klippenstein
Southern Maine · 2012-13
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.