IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicholas Ursitti Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-02-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Burlington Cougars OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2012-13 Toronto Patriots OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 Toronto Patriots OJHL 39 5 10 15 0.385 0.1075 0.1129 0.2654 0.2786
2014-15 Toronto Patriots OJHL 51 22 15 37 0.726 0.2027 0.2023 0.5007 0.4998
2015-16 — OJHL 47 22 32 54 1.149 0.3210 0.3027 0.7929 0.7477
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 26 10 8 18 0.692
2018-19 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 25 7 8 15 0.600
2017-18 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SO 22 11 8 19 0.864
2016-17 Hamilton D3 NESCAC FR 22 5 4 9 0.409
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2016-17 · Hamilton
+82.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16213
Forward overall
#657
Forward born in 1996
#1056
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Timothy Weinstein
Trinity · 2016-17
3.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Fraser Smith
SUNY Potsdam · 2006-07
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
George Thurston
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.