IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Dunn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-10-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 New England Wolves EHL 40 12 17 29 0.725 0.1675 0.1701 0.3547 0.3601
2015-16 New England Wolves EHL 37 13 14 27 0.730 0.1686 0.1638 0.3570 0.3468
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Fredonia D1 SUNYAC JR 20 5 6 11 0.550
2018-19 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC JR 20 5 6 11 0.550
2017-18 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 23 9 7 16 0.696
2016-17 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 16 3 3 6 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2016-17 · Fredonia
+163.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20967
Forward overall
#778
Forward born in 1995
#465
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Keegan Driscoll
Alvernia · 2024-25
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Fralich
St. Scholastica · 2016-17
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tino Alunni
Lebanon Valley · 2017-18
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.