IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jaret Lalli Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-07-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Bemidji High USHS-MN 25 1 1 2 0.080 0.0101 0.0103 0.0194 0.0198
2017-18 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 47 1 21 22 0.468 0.0901 0.0893 0.2952 0.2927
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 24 1 11 12 0.500
2021-22 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 26 2 6 8 0.308
2020-21 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 2 0 2 2 1.000
2020-21 Concordia (MN) D1 — JR 2 0 2 2 1.000
2019-20 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 26 0 5 5 0.192
2019-20 Concordia (MN) D1 — SO 26 0 5 5 0.192
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2019-20 · Concordia
+252.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19803
Defenseman overall
#2755
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gavin Simopoulos
Southern Maine · 2022-23
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jamie Lukas
SUNY Brockport · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Headland
Canton · 2017-18
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.