IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Almeida Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-09-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier-Classic 20 3 1 4 0.200 0.0601 0.0615 0.1647 0.1685
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 SR 28 0 11 11 0.393
2018-19 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 JR 31 4 9 13 0.419
2017-18 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 SO 22 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 FR 26 0 2 2 0.077
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2016-17 · Saint Anselm
+32.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19159
Defenseman overall
#2306
Defenseman born in 1996
#313
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joel Langevin
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Reifler
Elmira · 2018-19
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Blais
Wisconsin-Superior · 2014-15
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.