IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Biard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-09-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 56 11 24 35 0.625 0.1356 0.1530 0.4836 0.5455
2012-13 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 57 11 17 28 0.491 0.1065 0.1154 0.3800 0.4119
2013-14 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 26 3 5 8 0.308 0.0667 0.0690 0.2381 0.2462
2014-15 — CCHL 45 10 9 19 0.422 0.0916 0.0905 0.3267 0.3227
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Wentworth D3 CNE — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#41037
Forward overall
#1736
Forward born in 1995
#1116
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Thue
Hamilton · 2023-24
0.433 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Redmon
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2014-15
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Eppright
University of New England · 2015-16
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.