IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Atsoff Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-10-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Mahoning Valley Phantoms NAHL 44 10 4 14 0.318 0.1169 0.1165 0.3359 0.3348
2006-07 Mahoning Valley Phantoms NAHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0525 0.0497 0.1508 0.1429
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 UMass Boston D3 NEHC SR 24 15 10 25 1.042
2009-10 UMass Boston D3 NEHC JR 24 10 12 22 0.917
2008-09 UMass Boston D3 NEHC SO 24 9 7 16 0.667
2007-08 UMass Boston D3 NEHC FR 27 12 15 27 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2007-08 · UMass Boston
+1429.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#41070
Forward overall
#1323
Forward born in 1986
#4396
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shane Prifrel
Worcester State · 2021-22
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Caruso
UMass Boston · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Raphaël-Noah Boiteau
Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.