IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Atsoff Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-10-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Mahoning Valley Phantoms NAHL 44 10 4 14 0.318 0.1181 0.1177 0.3369 0.3358
2006-07 Mahoning Valley Phantoms NAHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0531 0.0503 0.1513 0.1434
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 UMass Boston D3 — SR 24 15 10 25 1.042
2009-10 UMass Boston D3 — JR 24 10 12 22 0.917
2008-09 UMass Boston D3 — SO 24 9 7 16 0.667
2007-08 UMass Boston D3 — FR 27 12 15 27 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2007-08 · UMass Boston
+1412.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33948
Forward overall
#1234
Forward born in 1986
#4226
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Dau
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shane Prifrel
Worcester State · 2021-22
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Caruso
UMass Boston · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kasey Kulczycki
Canton · 2013-14
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.