IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Raphaël-Noah Boiteau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-10-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Universel Collège Gatineau USPHL-Premier 2 1 1 2 1.000 0.3296 0.3321 0.3402 0.3428
2024-25 Universel Collège Gatineau USPHL-Premier 3 2 1 3 1.000 0.3296 0.3128 0.3402 0.3229
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western Connecticut D3 LittleEast — 7 1 0 1 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2025-26 · Western Connecticut
-47.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zach Lynes
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
0.294 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Nelson
St. Thomas · 2003-04
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Micky Knox
Wisconsin-Stout · 2010-11
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.