← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyson Bruce Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-11-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 48 12 9 21 0.438 0.1072 0.1114 0.3012 0.3129
2014-15 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 51 27 15 42 0.824 0.2018 0.1992 0.5670 0.5596
2015-16 Markham Royals OJHL 54 31 31 62 1.148 0.2814 0.2622 0.7905 0.7366
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Canton D1 SUNYAC SR 24 9 5 14 0.583
2019-20 Canton D3 SUNYAC SR 24 9 5 14 0.583
2018-19 Canton D1 SUNYAC JR 14 7 12 19 1.357
2018-19 Canton D3 SUNYAC JR 14 7 12 19 1.357
2018-19 Oswego D1 JR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 13 1 3 4 0.308
2016-17 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 3 1 0 1 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2016-17 · SUNY Oswego
+64.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19707
Forward overall
#737
Forward born in 1995
#747
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2006-07
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2021-22
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trine · 2014-15
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.