IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyson Bruce Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-11-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 48 12 9 21 0.438 0.1222 0.1269 0.3019 0.3136
2014-15 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 51 27 15 42 0.824 0.2301 0.2271 0.5683 0.5609
2015-16 Markham Royals OJHL 54 31 31 62 1.148 0.3208 0.2989 0.7923 0.7382
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Canton D3 — SR 24 9 5 14 0.583
2018-19 Canton D3 — JR 14 7 12 19 1.357
2018-19 SUNY Oswego D3 — JR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 SUNY Oswego D3 — SO 13 1 3 4 0.308
2016-17 SUNY Oswego D3 — FR 3 1 0 1 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2016-17 · SUNY Oswego
+44.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14933
Forward overall
#539
Forward born in 1995
#915
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean Farley
Utica · 2006-07
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Ruberto
Hamilton · 2008-09
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
George Thurston
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.