IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joey Petronack Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-12-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 North Iowa Bulls NA3HL 38 5 23 28 0.737 0.0939 0.0943 — —
2019-20 North Iowa Bulls NA3HL 24 4 16 20 0.833 0.1062 0.1062 0.2636 0.2636
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Concordia D3 MIAC — 24 2 3 5 0.208
2023-24 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA SR 24 2 3 5 0.208
2022-23 Concordia D3 MIAC — 27 3 10 13 0.481
2022-23 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA JR 26 3 9 12 0.462
2021-22 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SO 23 2 2 4 0.174
2020-21 Wisconsin-Stout D1 BigTen FR 11 1 5 6 0.545
2020-21 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen FR 11 1 5 6 0.545
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2020-21 · Wisconsin-Stout
+512.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
57%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10800
Defenseman overall
#2034
Defenseman born in 1999
#1671
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Schurhamer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Folin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Sam Piazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Richard Buri
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Average D
NCAAe PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.