IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Scott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-03-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Breck School USHS-MN 25 16 12 28 1.120 0.3015 0.3024 0.2720 0.2728
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Williams D3 NESCAC JR 26 11 6 17 0.654
2018-19 Williams D3 NESCAC SO 21 2 7 9 0.429
2017-18 Williams D3 NESCAC FR 26 4 10 14 0.538
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2017-18 · Williams
+108.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15521
Forward overall
#711
Forward born in 1998
#614
in USHS-MN

D1 Comparables

Ryan Hitchcock
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Yale (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.34 No data
NCAAe PPG
Liam Pecararo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Maine (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dakota Joshua
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Seamus Malone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.54 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.74 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Saler
St. Scholastica · 2000-01
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Rob Johnson
St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Dawson
Nazareth · 2008-09
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.