IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Scott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-03-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Breck School USHS-MN 25 16 12 28 1.120 0.1418 0.1422 0.2720 0.2728
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Williams D3 NESCAC JR 26 11 6 17 0.654
2018-19 Williams D3 NESCAC SO 21 2 7 9 0.429
2017-18 Williams D3 NESCAC FR 26 4 10 14 0.538
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2017-18 · Williams
+342.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15946
Forward overall
#735
Forward born in 1998
#612
in USHS-MN

D1 Comparables

Michael Booth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Boston College (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Milan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alex Tuch
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Boston College (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Sam Kauppila
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Liam Pecararo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Maine (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Saler
St. Scholastica · 2000-01
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Barkwell
Adrian · 2003-04
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jesper Stråle
Elmira · 2006-07
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.