← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cody Milan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-04-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 34 4 6 10 0.294 0.1808 0.1979 0.8665 0.9485
2013-14 USHL 47 4 5 9 0.192 0.1177 0.1233 0.5642 0.5912
2014-15 Tri-City Storm USHL 60 11 15 26 0.433 0.2663 0.2660 1.2766 1.2750
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Michigan D1 BigTen 36 7 13 20 0.556
2018-19 Michigan State D1 BigTen SR 36 7 13 20 0.556
2017-18 Michigan D1 BigTen 33 6 15 21 0.636
2017-18 Michigan State D1 BigTen JR 33 6 15 21 0.636
2016-17 Michigan D1 BigTen 24 1 4 5 0.208
2016-17 Michigan State D1 BigTen SO 24 1 4 5 0.208
2015-16 Michigan D1 BigTen 29 2 5 7 0.241
2015-16 Michigan State D1 BigTen FR 29 2 5 7 0.241
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2015-16 · Michigan
+35.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28253
Forward overall
#1161
Forward born in 1996
#2718
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Arizona State (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Maine (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2010-11
1.241 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2017-18
1.276 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.