IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Barkwell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-01-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 3 1 0 1 0.333 0.0642 0.0713 0.2102 0.2334
2004-05 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 58 11 20 31 0.534 0.1029 0.1094 0.3371 0.3584
2005-06 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 52 22 19 41 0.788 0.1518 0.1536 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Adrian D3 NCHA — 10 0 1 1 0.100
2010-11 Adrian D3 NCHA — 5 2 2 4 0.800
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.80
2010-11 · Adrian
+587.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30595
Forward overall
#981
Forward born in 1987

D1 Comparables

Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Blake Winiecki
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean Burke
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2000-01
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Steve Piccoli
Finlandia · 2001-02
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Musselwhite
SUNY Oswego · 2003-04
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.