| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Nepean Raiders | CCHL | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.500 | 0.1596 | 0.1771 | 0.3871 | 0.4296 |
| 2016-17 | Nepean Raiders | CCHL | 7 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0.571 | 0.1824 | 0.1928 | 0.4423 | 0.4676 |
| 2017-18 | — | CCHL | 49 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 0.306 | 0.0977 | 0.0982 | 0.2370 | 0.2383 |
| 2018-19 | Kemptville 73's | CCHL | 60 | 15 | 19 | 34 | 0.567 | 0.1809 | 0.1739 | 0.4387 | 0.4217 |
| 2019-20 | Kemptville 73's | CCHL | 26 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 0.462 | 0.1474 | 0.1474 | 0.3572 | 0.3572 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | Elmira | D3 | UCHC | SR | 29 | 18 | 20 | 38 | 1.310 |
| 2022-23 | Elmira | D3 | UCHC | JR | 22 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 0.591 |
| 2021-22 | Elmira | D3 | UCHC | SO | 24 | 8 | 15 | 23 | 0.958 |
| 2020-21 | Elmira | D1 | — | FR | 11 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 0.636 |
| 2020-21 | Elmira | D3 | UCHC | FR | 11 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 0.636 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.