← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicholas Domitrovic Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-02-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Nepean Raiders CCHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.1596 0.1771 0.3871 0.4296
2016-17 Nepean Raiders CCHL 7 3 1 4 0.571 0.1824 0.1928 0.4423 0.4676
2017-18 CCHL 49 9 6 15 0.306 0.0977 0.0982 0.2370 0.2383
2018-19 Kemptville 73's CCHL 60 15 19 34 0.567 0.1809 0.1739 0.4387 0.4217
2019-20 Kemptville 73's CCHL 26 6 6 12 0.462 0.1474 0.1474 0.3572 0.3572
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Elmira D3 UCHC SR 29 18 20 38 1.310
2022-23 Elmira D3 UCHC JR 22 7 6 13 0.591
2021-22 Elmira D3 UCHC SO 24 8 15 23 0.958
2020-21 Elmira D1 FR 11 5 2 7 0.636
2020-21 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 11 5 2 7 0.636
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2020-21 · Elmira
+417.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#37225
Forward overall
#2055
Forward born in 1999
#1151
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bowdoin · 2023-24
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2014-15
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Becker · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.