| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Nepean Raiders | CCHL | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.500 | 0.1085 | 0.1204 | 0.3869 | 0.4294 |
| 2016-17 | Nepean Raiders | CCHL | 7 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0.571 | 0.1239 | 0.1310 | 0.4421 | 0.4674 |
| 2017-18 | — | CCHL | 49 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 0.306 | 0.0664 | 0.0668 | 0.2368 | 0.2381 |
| 2018-19 | Kemptville 73's | CCHL | 60 | 15 | 19 | 34 | 0.567 | 0.1229 | 0.1181 | 0.4385 | 0.4215 |
| 2019-20 | Kemptville 73's | CCHL | 26 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 0.462 | 0.1001 | 0.1001 | 0.3571 | 0.3571 |
| 2025-26 | Brock Univ. | USports-M | 14 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0.357 | 0.1884 | 0.1529 | 1.0467 | 0.8493 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | Elmira | D3 | UCHC | SR | 29 | 18 | 20 | 38 | 1.310 |
| 2022-23 | Elmira | D3 | UCHC | JR | 22 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 0.591 |
| 2021-22 | Elmira | D3 | UCHC | SO | 24 | 8 | 15 | 23 | 0.958 |
| 2020-21 | Elmira | D1 | UCHC | FR | 11 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 0.636 |
| 2020-21 | Elmira | D3 | UCHC | FR | 11 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 0.636 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.