← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicholas Domitrovic Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-02-15 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Brock Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Nepean Raiders CCHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.1085 0.1204 0.3869 0.4294
2016-17 Nepean Raiders CCHL 7 3 1 4 0.571 0.1239 0.1310 0.4421 0.4674
2017-18 CCHL 49 9 6 15 0.306 0.0664 0.0668 0.2368 0.2381
2018-19 Kemptville 73's CCHL 60 15 19 34 0.567 0.1229 0.1181 0.4385 0.4215
2019-20 Kemptville 73's CCHL 26 6 6 12 0.462 0.1001 0.1001 0.3571 0.3571
2025-26 Brock Univ. USports-M 14 4 1 5 0.357 0.1884 0.1529 1.0467 0.8493
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Elmira D3 UCHC SR 29 18 20 38 1.310
2022-23 Elmira D3 UCHC JR 22 7 6 13 0.591
2021-22 Elmira D3 UCHC SO 24 8 15 23 0.958
2020-21 Elmira D1 UCHC FR 11 5 2 7 0.636
2020-21 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 11 5 2 7 0.636
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2020-21 · Elmira
+662.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32106
Forward overall
#1723
Forward born in 1999

D2/3 Comparables

Framingham State · 2010-11
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nazareth · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2010-11
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.