← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Donohue Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-01-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier-Classic 26 1 5 6 0.231 0.0648 0.0674 0.1898 0.1975
2016-17 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier-Classic 45 9 14 23 0.511 0.1435 0.1423 0.4202 0.4168
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 University of New England D1 CNE SR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 University of New England D3 CNE SR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 University of New England D1 CNE JR 22 3 5 8 0.364
2019-20 University of New England D3 CNE JR 22 3 5 8 0.364
2018-19 University of New England D1 CNE SO 26 9 7 16 0.615
2018-19 University of New England D3 CNE SO 26 9 7 16 0.615
2017-18 University of New England D3 CNE FR 15 1 2 3 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2017-18 · University of New England
+107.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#44512
Forward overall
#2211
Forward born in 1997
#208
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2015-16
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Becker · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2016-17
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.