IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Scott Mifsud Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1982-02-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Thornhill Rattlers OJHL 48 43 57 100 2.083 0.6258 0.6063 1.4260 1.3816
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SR 39 21 27 48 1.231
2003-04 Vermont D1 HockeyEast JR 35 12 13 25 0.714
2002-03 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SO 30 5 19 24 0.800
2001-02 Vermont D1 HockeyEast FR 28 8 7 15 0.536
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.56
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2001-02 · Vermont
-5.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3588
Forward overall
#130
Forward born in 1982
#5
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Frank Vatrano
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UMass
0.61 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nathan Walker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Marian (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Suess
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Toninato
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.67 Average
NCAAe PPG
Peter Quenneville
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.80 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Robbie Murden
Hamilton · 2010-11
1.091 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bloom
New England · 2011-12
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Stevens
Wisconsin-Stout · 2020-21
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.