IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Scott Mifsud Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1982-02-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Thornhill Rattlers OJHL 48 43 57 100 2.083 0.5106 0.4947 1.4344 1.3897
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SR 39 21 27 48 1.231
2003-04 Vermont D1 HockeyEast JR 35 12 13 25 0.714
2002-03 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SO 30 5 19 24 0.800
2001-02 Vermont D1 HockeyEast FR 28 8 7 15 0.536
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.42
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2001-02 · Vermont
+26.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3734
Forward overall
#134
Forward born in 1982
#5
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Dave Gust
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nathan Walker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Marian (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Frank Vatrano
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ UMass
0.55 No data
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Suess
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Adam Gilmour
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Boston College (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Blanchard
King's · 2018-19
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2011-12
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Stevens
Wisconsin-Stout · 2020-21
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.