IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Brown Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-07-05 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Lakehead Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 — OHL 60 2 6 8 0.133 0.0771 0.0817 0.3425 0.3627
2001-02 Belleville Bulls OHL 60 3 7 10 0.167 0.0964 0.0974 0.4283 0.4328
2002-03 Belleville Bulls OHL 63 11 9 20 0.318 0.1837 0.1767 0.8158 0.7848
2003-04 Belleville Bulls OHL 60 15 10 25 0.417 0.2411 0.2189 1.0707 0.9723
2005-06 Lakehead Univ. USports-M 23 5 6 11 0.478 0.2524 0.2568 1.4019 1.4265
2006-07 Lakehead Univ. USports-M 28 4 10 14 0.500 0.2638 0.2545 1.4655 1.4140
2007-08 Lakehead Univ. USports-M 28 20 6 26 0.929 0.4899 0.4491 2.7217 2.4949
2008-09 Lakehead Univ. USports-M 26 5 15 20 0.769 0.4058 0.3504 2.2545 1.9468
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC — 34 0 8 8 0.235
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2025-26 · St. Lawrence
-29.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8535
Forward overall
#317
Forward born in 1983

D2/3 Comparables

Jake McAlpine
Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Clarke
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
1.267 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lee Stubbs
Manhattanville · 2000-01
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.