IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Deiter Stange Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-07-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Brooklyn Aviators USPHL-Premier 37 12 21 33 0.892 0.1200 0.1253 0.3036 0.3170
2018-19 Brooklyn Aviators USPHL-Premier 41 26 30 56 1.366 0.1839 0.1822 0.4650 0.4608
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Worcester State D3 MASCAC SR 25 5 15 20 0.800
2021-22 Worcester State D3 MASCAC JR 25 6 11 17 0.680
2020-21 Worcester State D3 MASCAC SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Worcester State D3 MASCAC FR 26 3 9 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2019-20 · Worcester State
+238.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
45%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26368
Forward overall
#1108
Forward born in 1999
#545
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Sieckhaus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Bentley (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Robin Höglund
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zeke Hume
Manhattanville · 2002-03
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Antoine Bélisle
Middlebury · 2017-18
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Vince Perreault
Westfield State · 2008-09
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.