IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach VanCompernolle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-05-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Gillette Wild NA3HL 45 8 31 39 0.867 0.1088 0.1115 0.2736 0.2804
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Trine D3 NCHA JR 12 1 0 1 0.083
2020-21 Trine D1 NCHA SO 5 1 0 1 0.200
2020-21 Trine D3 NCHA SO 5 1 0 1 0.200
2019-20 Trine D1 NCHA FR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Trine D3 NCHA FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
88%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6904
Defenseman overall
#1403
Defenseman born in 2000
#944
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Scott Moldenhauer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Josh McArdle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Brown (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Buchanan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Bentley (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dane Cooper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Brown (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Wade
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aidan Gallagher
Misericordia · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Magnavite
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2017-18
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim DeBord
Lawrence · 2018-19
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.