← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Magnavite Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-05-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Coulee Region Chill NA3HL 35 26 18 44 1.257 0.1578 0.1624 0.3969 0.4084
2018-19 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 8 1 1 2 0.250 0.0919 0.0914 0.2639 0.2623
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SR 23 5 8 13 0.565
2021-22 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC JR 7 1 1 2 0.286
2020-21 Saint Mary's (MN) D1 MIAC SO 6 3 0 3 0.500
2020-21 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SO 6 3 0 3 0.500
2019-20 Saint Mary's (MN) D1 MIAC FR 9 2 0 2 0.222
2019-20 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 9 2 0 2 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2019-20 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+116.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7235
Forward overall
#311
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2000-01
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connecticut College · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2014-15
0.524 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.