IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Adamsons Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-05-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 46 9 21 30 0.652 0.1400 0.1403 0.3194 0.3202
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 23 0 2 2 0.087
2020-21 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 5 1 0 1 0.200
2019-20 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SO 23 4 0 4 0.174
2018-19 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC FR 11 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
75%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29469
Forward overall
#1252
Forward born in 1998
#570
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mike Robinson
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ New Hampshire
0.11 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Robin Höglund
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jonathan Venter
SUNY Potsdam · 2015-16
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Fiorino
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bobby Polachek
Fredonia · 2013-14
0.958 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.