IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonathan Venter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-06-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 — USPHL-Premier-Classic 18 0 1 1 0.056 0.0167 0.0169 0.0458 0.0462
2016-17 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier-Classic 45 3 12 15 0.333 0.1001 0.0961 0.2745 0.2636
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 SUNY Potsdam D3 — JR 26 1 4 5 0.192
2018-19 SUNY Potsdam D3 — SO 25 1 3 4 0.160
2017-18 SUNY Potsdam D3 — FR 25 3 5 8 0.320
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2017-18 · SUNY Potsdam
+426.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18018
Defenseman overall
#2222
Defenseman born in 1996
#298
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Baxter Kimball
Fredonia · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Braeden McKinnon
Anna Maria · 2021-22
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Calhoun
UMass Boston · 2006-07
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.