IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carson Riddle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-06-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Austin Bruins NAHL 47 2 3 5 0.106 0.0378 0.0415 0.1117 0.1227
2019-20 Austin Bruins NAHL 49 11 19 30 0.612 0.2175 0.2175 0.6427 0.6427
2020-21 Austin Bruins NAHL 52 14 23 37 0.712 0.2527 0.2527 0.7470 0.7470
2021-22 Austin Bruins NAHL 52 20 25 45 0.865 0.3074 0.2922 0.9086 0.8636
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SR 26 8 8 16 0.615
2024-25 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 15 3 6 9 0.600
2022-23 Aurora D3 NCHA — 23 5 2 7 0.304
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2022-23 · Aurora
+85.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15583
Forward overall
#709
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joey Martini
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Egan
Babson · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike McPherson
Plymouth State · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.