← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luciano Bucci Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-04-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier-Classic 23 1 3 4 0.174 0.0488 0.0514 0.1430 0.1506
2015-16 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier-Classic 14 2 2 4 0.286 0.0802 0.0805 0.2350 0.2360
2016-17 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier-Classic 41 2 11 13 0.317 0.0890 0.0850 0.2608 0.2492
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Western New England D1 CNE JR 25 3 6 9 0.360
2019-20 Western New England D3 CNE 25 3 6 9 0.360
2018-19 King's D1 MAC SO 25 7 9 16 0.640
2018-19 King's D3 MAC 25 7 9 16 0.640
2017-18 King's D3 MAC 25 3 11 14 0.560
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2017-18 · King's
+686.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#51803
Forward overall
#2447
Forward born in 1996
#267
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Suffolk · 2014-15
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia (WI) · 2012-13
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Suffolk · 2001-02
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.