← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gustav Sandberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-05-23 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Potomac Patriots USPHL-Premier 40 7 25 32 0.800 0.1046 0.1031 0.2715 0.2676
2023-24 Potomac Patriots USPHL-Premier 42 5 25 30 0.714 0.0934 0.0875 0.2424 0.2272
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Utah ACHA_D1 13 2 3 5 0.385
2024-25 Nichols D3 CNE 0 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 University of Utah ACHA_D1 13 2 3 5 0.385
2023-24 University of Utah ACHA_D1 13 2 3 5 0.385
2022-23 University of Utah ACHA_D1 13 2 3 5 0.385
2021-22 University of Utah ACHA_D1 13 2 3 5 0.385
2020-21 University of Utah ACHA_D1 13 2 3 5 0.385

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4674
Defenseman overall
#1148
Defenseman born in 2003
#1502
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Cortland · 2007-08
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2016-17
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2010-11
0.310 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.