IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Scott Henegar Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-05-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Marquette Rangers NAHL 56 9 22 31 0.554 0.2056 0.2117 0.5862 0.6035
2009-10 Marquette Rangers NAHL 58 14 28 42 0.724 0.2689 0.2660 0.7667 0.7585
2010-11 Michigan Warriors NAHL 58 19 24 43 0.741 0.2753 0.2583 0.7850 0.7366
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SR 31 10 16 26 0.839
2013-14 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen JR 30 12 12 24 0.800
2012-13 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — SO 27 10 6 16 0.593
2011-12 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — FR 29 5 4 9 0.310
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2011-12 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+38.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13880
Forward overall
#596
Forward born in 1990
#927
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vadim Vasjonkin
Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nathan Garnier
SUNY Cortland · 2023-24
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Couto
SUNY Potsdam · 2009-10
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.