IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin Valentine Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-05-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Philadelphia Jr. Flyers EHL 3 1 1 2 0.667 0.1431 0.1565 0.3265 0.3570
2015-16 Hartford Jr. Wolfpack EHL 34 7 11 18 0.529 0.1136 0.1139 0.2592 0.2599
2016-17 Hartford Jr. Wolfpack EHL 46 14 19 33 0.717 0.1540 0.1474 0.3513 0.3363
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Fredonia D3 — SO 22 3 2 5 0.227
2017-18 Fredonia D3 — FR 25 5 3 8 0.320
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2017-18 · Fredonia
+179.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30028
Forward overall
#1297
Forward born in 1996
#605
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Duncan
Lake Forest · 2015-16
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Mandigo
Trinity · 2014-15
0.321 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Cosmos
UMass Boston · 2003-04
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.