IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin Valentine Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-05-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Philadelphia Jr. Flyers EHL 3 1 1 2 0.667 0.1540 0.1684 0.3262 0.3566
2015-16 Hartford Jr. Wolfpack EHL 34 7 11 18 0.529 0.1223 0.1226 0.2590 0.2597
2016-17 Hartford Jr. Wolfpack EHL 46 14 19 33 0.717 0.1657 0.1586 0.3510 0.3360
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Fredonia D1 SUNYAC SO 22 3 2 5 0.227
2018-19 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 22 3 2 5 0.227
2017-18 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 25 5 3 8 0.320
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2017-18 · Fredonia
+159.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24979
Forward overall
#1011
Forward born in 1996
#648
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Duncan
Lake Forest · 2015-16
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Cosmos
UMass Boston · 2003-04
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Mandigo
Trinity · 2014-15
0.321 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.