IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ross Mandigo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-05-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 59 28 34 62 1.051 0.2999 0.2758 0.8134 0.7480
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Trinity D3 NESCAC SR 13 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Trinity D3 NESCAC JR 9 0 3 3 0.333
2016-17 Trinity D3 NESCAC SO 17 3 2 5 0.294
2015-16 Trinity D3 NESCAC FR 28 6 3 9 0.321
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2015-16 · Trinity
+36.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10472
Forward overall
#423
Forward born in 1994
#169
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Ratzloff
Augsburg · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Keegan Milligan
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.781 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Kimball
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.