IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Steve Hoffart Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1981-06-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 58 16 22 38 0.655 0.1893 0.1872 0.4932 0.4877
2001-02 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 62 9 14 23 0.371 0.1072 0.1008 0.2793 0.2626
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 Manhattanville D3 — SR 24 3 1 4 0.167
2004-05 Manhattanville D3 — JR 26 2 3 5 0.192
2003-04 Manhattanville D3 — SO 13 0 2 2 0.154
2002-03 Manhattanville D3 — FR 25 4 6 10 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2002-03 · Manhattanville
+213.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7821
Defenseman overall
#693
Defenseman born in 1981
#1087
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Braeden McKinnon
Anna Maria · 2021-22
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lubos Taragel
Hamline · 2000-01
1.143 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Baxter Kimball
Fredonia · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.