IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Dodge Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-05-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Oakville Blades OJHL 39 17 26 43 1.103 0.3312 0.3594 0.7547 0.8189
2003-04 Oakville Blades OJHL 45 33 45 78 1.733 0.5207 0.5416 1.1864 1.2340
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Clarkson D1 ECAC SR 39 12 14 26 0.667
2006-07 Clarkson D1 ECAC JR 36 18 21 39 1.083
2005-06 Clarkson D1 ECAC SO 38 16 25 41 1.079
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.40
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.08
2005-06 · Clarkson
+168.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7123
Forward overall
#249
Forward born in 1986
#82
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Gabe Guertler
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Malone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.87 PPG
→ Harvard (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Weis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Motte
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Moore
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Denver (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

John Barrett
Wilkes · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Hudson
Manhattanville · 2004-05
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Iacullo
Saint Anselm · 2015-16
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.