IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Dissanayake Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-03-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Pickering Panthers OJHL 45 9 7 16 0.356 0.0872 0.0940 0.2448 0.2639
2003-04 Pickering Panthers OJHL 47 15 24 39 0.830 0.2034 0.2101 0.5713 0.5902
2004-05 Pickering Panthers OJHL 49 19 26 45 0.918 0.2251 0.2212 0.6323 0.6213
2005-06 Pickering Panthers OJHL 40 15 27 42 1.050 0.2574 0.2435 0.7229 0.6837
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC JR 24 3 2 5 0.208
2007-08 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 10 1 1 2 0.200
2006-07 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 17 1 2 3 0.176
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2006-07 · Fredonia
-12.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17287
Forward overall
#595
Forward born in 1986
#601
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Louie Kamienski
Endicott · 2023-24
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Piccininno
Alvernia · 2023-24
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Kulas
Utica · 2005-06
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.