IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Dissanayake Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-03-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Pickering Panthers OJHL 45 9 7 16 0.356 0.1068 0.1151 0.2434 0.2624
2003-04 Pickering Panthers OJHL 47 15 24 39 0.830 0.2493 0.2575 0.5680 0.5868
2004-05 Pickering Panthers OJHL 49 19 26 45 0.918 0.2759 0.2711 0.6286 0.6177
2005-06 Pickering Panthers OJHL 40 15 27 42 1.050 0.3154 0.2983 0.7187 0.6798
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Fredonia D3 — JR 24 3 2 5 0.208
2007-08 Fredonia D3 — SO 10 1 1 2 0.200
2006-07 Fredonia D3 — FR 17 1 2 3 0.176
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2006-07 · Fredonia
-28.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16874
Forward overall
#570
Forward born in 1986
#732
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cameron Brown
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Foster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colin MacCormack
Bowdoin · 2004-05
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kailin Chen
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
1.454 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan McDonald
Framingham State · 2007-08
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.