IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Derek Flynn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-11-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 New England Stars NA3HL 39 5 13 18 0.462 0.1061 0.1170 0.1462 0.1613
2017-18 New England Stars NA3HL 45 14 37 51 1.133 0.2607 0.2743 0.3590 0.3778
2018-19 Collingwood Blues OJHL 38 1 3 4 0.105 0.0316 0.0313 0.0721 0.0714
2019-20 New England Stars NA3HL 46 16 42 58 1.261 0.2900 0.2900 0.3995 0.3995
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 GR 19 0 7 7 0.368
2023-24 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SR 24 2 7 9 0.375
2022-23 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 JR 26 1 14 15 0.577
2021-22 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SO 12 0 1 1 0.083
2020-21 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
65%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6594
Defenseman overall
#1461
Defenseman born in 1999
#922
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Richard Buri
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Schurhamer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dylan Nelson
Wisconsin-Superior · 2012-13
0.107 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Lamothe
Johnson & Wales · 2017-18
0.048 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Smith
Utica · 2004-05
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.