icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001-02 | Soo Greyhounds | OHL | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2002-03 | Soo Greyhounds | OHL | 60 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 0.167 | 0.0964 | 0.1040 | 0.4283 | 0.4620 |
| 2003-04 | Soo Greyhounds | OHL | 68 | 6 | 20 | 26 | 0.382 | 0.2212 | 0.2267 | 0.9826 | 1.0070 |
| 2004-05 | Soo Greyhounds | OHL | 64 | 5 | 27 | 32 | 0.500 | 0.2893 | 0.2815 | 1.2848 | 1.2499 |
| 2006-07 | Lakehead Univ. | USports-M | 12 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.333 | 0.1758 | 0.1902 | 0.9769 | 1.0567 |
| 2007-08 | Lakehead Univ. | USports-M | 28 | 6 | 17 | 23 | 0.821 | 0.4334 | 0.4479 | 2.4075 | 2.4880 |
| 2008-09 | Lakehead Univ. | USports-M | 23 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.261 | 0.1377 | 0.1350 | 0.7647 | 0.7496 |
| 2009-10 | Lakehead Univ. | USports-M | 27 | 1 | 9 | 10 | 0.370 | 0.1954 | 0.1827 | 1.0856 | 1.0149 |
| 2010-11 | Lakehead Univ. | USports-M | 23 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 0.348 | 0.1835 | 0.1631 | 1.0194 | 0.9063 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Utica | D3 | UCHC | FR | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.143 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.