icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000-01 | Moncton Wildcats | QMJHL | 50 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 0.480 | 0.2358 | 0.2221 | 1.2814 | 1.2067 |
| 2001-02 | — | OHL | 65 | 25 | 29 | 54 | 0.831 | 0.4806 | 0.4269 | 2.1754 | 1.9325 |
| 2005-06 | St. Francis Xavier Univ. | USports-M | 26 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 0.423 | 0.2232 | 0.1998 | 1.2398 | 1.1100 |
| 2006-07 | St. Francis Xavier Univ. | USports-M | 27 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 0.593 | 0.3127 | 0.2635 | 1.7365 | 1.4632 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Worcester State | D3 | MASCAC | SO | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2006-07 | Worcester State | D3 | MASCAC | FR | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.