IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dimitris Christou Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-06-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Oswego Stampede NA3HL 38 1 7 8 0.210 0.0264 0.0273 0.0665 0.0687
2018-19 Oswego Stampede NA3HL 41 8 20 28 0.683 0.0857 0.0840 0.2156 0.2113
2019-20 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0330 0.0330 0.0699 0.0699
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 GR 28 0 4 4 0.143
2023-24 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SR 20 2 3 5 0.250
2022-23 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 JR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SO 11 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
50%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15412
Defenseman overall
#2548
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Owen Peters
Western Connecticut · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyson Empey
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Billy Fetherston
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2000-01
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.