← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyson Empey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-06-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 34 4 4 8 0.235 0.0603 0.0661 0.1774 0.1945
2013-14 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 48 7 6 13 0.271 0.0694 0.0724 0.2041 0.2130
2014-15 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 56 9 17 26 0.464 0.1190 0.1180 0.3500 0.3470
2015-16 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 46 14 15 29 0.630 0.1615 0.1522 0.4752 0.4477
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Geneseo D1 SR 23 17 13 30 1.304
2019-20 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SR 23 17 13 30 1.304
2018-19 Geneseo D1 JR 29 14 18 32 1.103
2018-19 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC JR 29 14 18 32 1.103
2017-18 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SO 29 21 15 36 1.241
2016-17 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC FR 11 2 3 5 0.455
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2016-17 · SUNY Geneseo
+283.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#36629
Forward overall
#1500
Forward born in 1995
#863
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern Maine · 2021-22
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnson & Wales · 2018-19
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.