← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyson Empey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-06-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 34 4 4 8 0.235 0.0680 0.0746 0.1771 0.1942
2013-14 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 48 7 6 13 0.271 0.0782 0.0816 0.2039 0.2128
2014-15 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 56 9 17 26 0.464 0.1341 0.1329 0.3495 0.3465
2015-16 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 46 14 15 29 0.630 0.1821 0.1716 0.4746 0.4472
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 SUNY Geneseo D3 SR 23 17 13 30 1.304
2018-19 SUNY Geneseo D3 JR 29 14 18 32 1.103
2017-18 SUNY Geneseo D3 SO 29 21 15 36 1.241
2016-17 SUNY Geneseo D3 FR 11 2 3 5 0.455
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2016-17 · SUNY Geneseo
+240.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28869
Forward overall
#1185
Forward born in 1995
#1058
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern Maine · 2021-22
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryn Athyn · 2017-18
1.044 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.