IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason Gorrie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-12-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Streetsville Derbys (OLD) OJHL 49 13 19 32 0.653 0.1601 0.1638 0.4497 0.4600
2004-05 — OJHL 40 20 29 49 1.225 0.3002 0.2920 0.8434 0.8202
2005-06 Streetsville Derbys (OLD) OJHL 40 22 26 48 1.200 0.2941 0.2752 0.8262 0.7731
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SO 1 0 0 0 0.000
2006-07 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 15 1 1 2 0.133
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2006-07 · SUNY Plattsburgh
-44.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13964
Forward overall
#451
Forward born in 1985
#400
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Kneeland
Lake Forest · 2003-04
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nathan Stachowiak
SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Vincent Dekumbis
Lawrence · 2017-18
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.