IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Auger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-12-16 Country: Canada
2006 · Round 6, Pick #169  ·  Chicago Blackhawks Chicago Blackhawks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Wellington Dukes OJHL 46 15 15 30 0.652 0.1599 0.1793 0.4490 0.5035
2004-05 Wellington Dukes OJHL 44 25 30 55 1.250 0.3064 0.3281 0.8606 0.9216
2005-06 Wellington Dukes OJHL 47 41 51 92 1.957 0.4798 0.4962 1.3477 1.3937
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast SR 36 9 14 23 0.639
2008-09 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast JR 14 2 1 3 0.214
2007-08 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast SO 33 4 10 14 0.424
2006-07 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast FR 34 2 10 12 0.353
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.37
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2006-07 · UMass Lowell
-3.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7950
Forward overall
#287
Forward born in 1987
#83
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Alex Roos
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Kelleher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
Evan Allen
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Smith
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Elite
NCAAe PPG
John Hayden
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Yale (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joshua Burke
Amherst · 2018-19
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mickey Gilchrist
Middlebury · 2002-03
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Blanchard
King's · 2018-19
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.