IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mickey Gilchrist Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-09-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Nepean Raiders CCHL 46 14 15 29 0.630 0.1799 0.1998 0.4880 0.5419
2001-02 Nepean Raiders CCHL 55 19 30 49 0.891 0.2543 0.2705 0.6896 0.7336
2002-03 Nepean Raiders CCHL 55 34 42 76 1.382 0.3944 0.4015 1.0697 1.0889
2003-04 Nepean Raiders CCHL 55 32 43 75 1.364 0.3892 0.3767 1.0556 1.0217
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Middlebury D3 — SR 26 10 14 24 0.923
2006-07 Middlebury D3 — JR 31 19 15 34 1.097
2005-06 Middlebury D3 — SO 30 24 26 50 1.667
2004-05 Middlebury D3 — FR 28 21 7 28 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2004-05 · Middlebury
+202.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7013
Forward overall
#227
Forward born in 1984
#74
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Judd Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max McHugh
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Forgione
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Reuschlein
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Andrew Mayer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Headland
Canton · 2017-18
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dustin Norman
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2003-04
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Buster Larsson
Utica · 2017-18
0.679 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.