IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dustin Norman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-09-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Neepawa Titans MJHL 62 43 44 87 1.403 0.2701 0.2804 0.8849 0.9187
2003-04 Neepawa Titans MJHL 46 22 33 55 1.196 0.2302 0.2283 0.7540 0.7477
2004-05 Neepawa Titans MJHL 55 36 37 73 1.327 0.2555 0.2413 0.8370 0.7904
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SR 25 3 5 8 0.320
2007-08 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen JR 26 13 17 30 1.154
2006-07 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 27 10 10 20 0.741
2005-06 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 20 6 11 17 0.850
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.85
2005-06 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+320.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11877
Forward overall
#364
Forward born in 1984
#47
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Headland
Canton · 2018-19
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Horan
Franklin Pierce · 2021-22
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Gamache
Hobart · 2011-12
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.