← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Chamberlain Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-06-05 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Nipissing Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Wellington Dukes OJHL 42 11 15 26 0.619 0.1517 0.1661 0.4262 0.4666
2004-05 Wellington Dukes OJHL 44 16 19 35 0.795 0.1950 0.2037 0.5477 0.5720
2005-06 Wellington Dukes OJHL 48 17 27 44 0.917 0.2247 0.2264 0.6311 0.6359
2006-07 Wellington Dukes OJHL 49 19 37 56 1.143 0.2801 0.2682 0.7869 0.7534
2010-11 Nipissing Univ. USports-M 9 1 2 3 0.333 0.1758 0.1702 0.9769 0.9458
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2008-09 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 13 3 8 11 0.846
2007-08 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 6 2 0 2 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2007-08 · SUNY Oswego
+54.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16323
Forward overall
#562
Forward born in 1987

D2/3 Comparables

Nazareth · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2015-16
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Framingham State · 2010-11
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.